AI Refund Scams have surged over the past few months, turning India’s food delivery and quick commerce sectors into the newest battleground for digital fraud. Social feeds are flooded with strange but viral posts: eggs cracked neatly on kitchen slabs, cakes that look damaged yet oddly perfect—images that don’t match real physics. This wave of hyper-realistic fraud is driven by the rising accessibility of advanced generative AI tools. What once required technical skill and time can now be faked in seconds by giving a simple prompt—like “apply more cracks”—to an accessible image editor. This ease was dramatically demonstrated by an infamous quick commerce case, where a single slightly damaged egg was reportedly morphed into a full tray of broken ones, securing an unchallenged refund.
The continued rise of these scams has quickly evolved into one of the most quietly destructive threats facing the country’s food delivery and quick-commerce sector. Major platforms built their business on speed, trust, and customer-first policies. Yet these core strengths are now being ruthlessly exploited, costing companies crores every month. Critically, the true financial impact goes much deeper than just the value of the refunded orders.
The True Financial Cost of AI Refund Scams
Behind every manipulated image lies a complete loss of product value. When platforms issue a refund, they absorb the full product cost alongside logistics overheads such as delivery fees, packaging costs, and vendor settlements. Even a tiny percentage of fake claims—as little as 0.1% of total orders—can quietly snowball into ₹10–₹50 lakh in monthly losses for major players operating at massive scale.
However, the problem doesn’t stop with cash flow. As AI-generated fake images become increasingly convincing—a direct consequence of the sophistication of these new, accessible editing models—platforms can no longer rely on simple visual checks. This forces the creation of entire departments dedicated to manual verification. Every suspicious complaint now demands meticulous human scrutiny. Every order history must be cross-checked. Every manipulation must be analyzed carefully before approving or rejecting a claim.
This intensive process creates a second layer of damage: operational strain. Customer support teams must be expanded. Review specialists must be trained in fraud detection rather than just customer service. This necessary friction slows down genuine refunds and increases customer frustration—a significant brand risk in an industry where speed and convenience are the ultimate currencies.
A Costly AI Arms Race
To effectively fight AI-generated fraud, companies are compelled to invest heavily in their own AI defense systems—a battle that is both expensive and endless. Quick-commerce platforms are now building advanced computer vision tools, image forensics systems, and machine-learning models designed to identify subtle irregularities in manipulated photos. These tools analyze shadows, texture mismatches, pixel distortions, and metadata patterns to catch fraud before it clears the system.
But generative AI evolves at lightning speed. Every improvement in fraud detection requires new datasets, constant re-training, and infrastructure upgrades. Companies are locked into an ongoing technological arms race, perpetually updating their algorithms just to keep pace with the new accessible AI tools that scammers use to bypass detection. The investment isn’t a one-time charge; it is an incessant cost that drains resources month after month.
Someone ordered eggs on Instamart and only one came cracked.
— kapilansh (@kapilansh_twt) November 24, 2025
Instead of just reporting it, they opened Gemini Nano and literally typed:
“apply more cracks.”
In a few seconds, AI turned that tray into 20+ cracked eggs — flawless, realistic, impossible to distinguish.
Support… pic.twitter.com/PnkNuG2Qt3
The Invisible Damage: Trust and Relationships
While the financial and operational losses are substantial, the deepest wound is the erosion of trust. Restaurants and grocery vendors often bear a share of the refund burden. When fraudulent claims spike, partners naturally begin to distrust the platform or question its policies. High-value, fragile, and premium products become increasingly risky to sell.
Platforms inevitably react by tightening refund rules, adding more steps, or demanding additional verification. While this reduces fraud, it simultaneously creates friction for honest customers. A customer-first experience gradually becomes a customer-suspicious experience, and the brand image suffers quietly but significantly. In a sector driven by convenience, even slight friction can push users to competing apps.
How Quick Commerce Can Respond
The solution is no longer a single tool or one policy change. It requires a more holistic defense—combining intelligent AI detection with selective human verification, adopting video-based evidence for high-value claims, and utilizing customer behavior models to identify repeat offenders before refunds are approved. Platforms must design a resilient system that protects the business without inadvertently punishing genuine customers.
This balanced approach will determine the long-term survival and credibility of India’s rapid delivery ecosystem. As the technology behind fraud grows stronger, companies must evolve equally fast, not only to protect their bottom line but also to safeguard the trust that keeps the entire ecosystem running.
AI Refund Scams are not merely small-time tricks; they are a sophisticated threat fundamentally reshaping the economics of India’s food and quick-commerce industry. The losses are multi-layered—from direct financial hits and rising operational overheads to massive investments in AI defense systems. Above all, the integrity of relationships between platforms, vendors, and customers is increasingly at stake.
To sustain the rapid-delivery revolution in India, companies must commit to smarter, more adaptive fraud prevention strategies. The cost of inaction is far greater than the price of innovation.
Read more: Code Red to the $4T Club: Strategy Behind Google’s AI Comeback
